Uretritis masculina gonocócica y no gonocócica Papel del laboratorio clínico en su diagnóstico microbiológico

Federico Díaz Gonzáles, .

Abstract

Experience of eight years with the laboratory diagnosis of male urethritis is reported; in 1557 patients with clinical suspicion and laboratory confirmation of urethritis. there was a marked predominance of the nongonococcal form (81%). Direct Gram-steined smear was of the utmost diagnostic value: most of the patients with gonococcal urethritis were found to have profuse urethral discharge. while scent or no discharge was the rule in the ningonococcal cases: aqueous, mucoid and mixed discharges were peculiar to the latter; Trichomonas vaginolis was of minimal importance. The lack of information concerning the relative importance of gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis. as well as postgonococcal urethritis in Colombia is emphasized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Federico Díaz Gonzáles Universidad de Antioquia
    Profesor Titular, Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología. Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Antioquia.
How to Cite
1.
Díaz Gonzáles F. Uretritis masculina gonocócica y no gonocócica Papel del laboratorio clínico en su diagnóstico microbiológico. biomedica [Internet]. 1982 Dec. 1 [cited 2024 May 18];2(4):172-6. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/1842
Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code