Comparación entre las técnicas de neutralización en ratón y E.L.I.S.A para determinar la potencia del anti-veneno crotalus durissus terrificus

María Cristina Forero CH., Moisés Wasserman, .

Abstract

Reports in the literature (3, 12, 13) suggest that it is feasible to replace with an ELISA test, the more cumbersome and expensive method of in-vivo neutralization for the assessment of the potency of antivenoms.  In this paper we compare both methods for the antivenom Crotalus durissus terrificus. We used purified Gamma-globulins and complete sera, and with neither was found any correlation between the methods tested. A plausible explanation is that while the in-vivo neutralization test is measuring antitoxin antibodies the ELISA test is measuring total antibodies. We suggest to verify the correlation using pure toxin as the antigen  for ELISA. We do not recommend at this stage, contrary to other authors suggestions (3), the use of ELISA for assessment of titers of antivenom Crotalus durissus terrificus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • María Cristina Forero CH. Instituto Nacional de Salud
    Bacterióloga, MSc, Grupo de Sueros, Sección de Producción Instituto Nacional de Salud.
  • Moisés Wasserman Instituto Nacional de Salud
    Jefe, Grupo de Bioquímica. Sección Diagnóstico, Investigación y Referencia. Instituto Nacional de Salud.
How to Cite
1.
Forero CH. MC, Wasserman M. Comparación entre las técnicas de neutralización en ratón y E.L.I.S.A para determinar la potencia del anti-veneno crotalus durissus terrificus. biomedica [Internet]. 1984 Dec. 1 [cited 2024 May 18];4(3-4):91-6. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/1889
Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code