Endophthalmitis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. after penetrating keratoplasty, case report with an epidemiological investigation

Claudia Blanco, María X. Núñez, .

Keywords: Endophthalmitis, corneal transplantation, Pseudomonas, piperacillin, infection

Abstract

Introduction. An endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a devasting case with very poor visual outcomes.
Objective. To determine the origin of an infection after a penetrating keratoplasty.
Materials and methods. After an endophthalmitis an epidemiological study was undertaken with the approval of the ethics committee and support of a medical team comprised of an epidemiologist, infectologist, bacteriologist and ophthalmologists specializing in cornea. Factors that may have contributed to the risk of infection were assessed, for example, the processing and preservation of the cornea in the moment of the extraction, the characteristics of the donor, recipient and infecting bacterium, as well as the details pertaining to the surgical operation.
Results. No risks factors were found in the institution, in the eye bank facilities, in the donor or in the receptor. However, sterile technique could not be guaranteed in the morgue where the corneal extraction occurred, and other isolated cases of endophthalmitis post-keratoplasty had been documented involving tissues from the same morgue that had been processed by two eye banks in the same city. Characteristics of the multi-resistant Pseudomonas sp. demonstrated its origin from a hospital environment due to its previous exposure to a variety of antibiotics.
Conclusions. Corneal extraction site must guarantee an antiseptic preparation and aseptic tissue donor recuperation; although in this study it was not feasible to accurately establish the infection source, all of the findings led to suspect a possible contamination at the morgue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Claudia Blanco 1 Unidad de Cirugía de Córnea y Refractiva, Grupo de Investigación Visión Sana, Clínica de Oftalmología de Cali, Cali, Colombia 2 Servicio de Oftalmología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
  • María X. Núñez 1 Unidad de Cirugía de Córnea y Refractiva, Grupo de Investigación Visión Sana, Clínica de Oftalmología de Cali, Cali, Colombia

References

1. Hassan SS, Wilhelmus KR. Eye-banking risk factors for fungal endophthalmitis compared with bacterial endophthalmitis after corneal transplantation. Medical Review Subcommittee of the Eye Bank Association of America. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:685-90.
2. Taban M, Behrens A, Newcomb RL, Nobe MY, McDonnell PJ. Incidence of endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty: a systematic review. Arch Ophthalmol.2005;123:605-9.
3. Aiello LP, Javitt JC, Canner JK. National outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty. Risks of endophthalmitis and retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol.1993;111:509-13.
4. Panda A, Satpathy G, Sethi HS. Survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in M-K preserved corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:679-83.
5. Eifrig CW, Scott IU, Flynn HW, Miller D. Endophthalmitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1714-7.
6. Hassan SS, Wilhelmus KR, Dahl P, Davis GC, Roberts RT, Ross KW, et al. Medical Review Subcommittee of the Eye Bank Association of America. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:235-9.
7. Wilhelmus KR, Hassan SS. The prognostic role of donor corneoscleral rim cultures in corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:440-5.
8. Fontana L, Errani PG, Zerbinati A, Musacchi Y, Di Pede B, Tassinari G. Frequency of positive donor rim cultures after penetrating keratoplasty using hypothermic and organ-cultured donor corneas. Cornea. 2007;26:552-6.
9. Pollack FM, Locachter-Khorazo D, Gutiérrez E. Bacteriologic study of "donor" eyes. Evaluation of antibacterial treatments prior to corneal grafting. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967;78:219-25.
10. Boberg-Ans J, Badsberg E, Rasmussen J. Frequency of infection in donor eyes post mortem: a method of obtaining sterile eyes for corneal grafting. Br J Ophthalmol. 1962;46:365-8.
11. Pels E, Vrensen GF. Microbial decontamination of human donor eyes with povidone-iodine: penetration, toxicity, and effectiveness. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:1019-26.
12. Robert PY, Camezind P, Drouet M, Ploy MC, Adenis JP. Internal and external contamination of donor corneas before in situ excision: bacterial risk factors in 93 donors. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:265-70.
13. Gómez CA, Leal AL, Pérez MJ, Navarrete ML. Mecanismos de resistencia en Pseudomonas aeruginosa: entendiendo a un peligroso enemigo. Rev Fac Med Univ Nac Colomb. 2005;53:27-34.
14. Everts RJ, Fowler WC, Chang DH, Reller LB. Corneoscleral rim cultures lack of utility and implications for clinical decision-making and infection prevention in the care of patients undergoing corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2001;20:586-9.
15. Harris AD, Perencevich E, Roghmann MC, Morris G, Kaye K, Johnson J. Risk factors for piperacillin-tazobactam resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among hospitalized patients. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 2002;46:854-8.
16. Ehlers N. Corneal banking and grafting: the background to the Danish Eye Bank System, where corneas await their patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:572-8.
17. Builles N, Perraud M, Reverdy ME, Burillon C, Crova P, Brun F, et al. Reducing contamination when removing and storing corneas: a multidisciplinary, transversal, and environmental approach. Cornea. 2006;25:185-92.
How to Cite
1.
Blanco C, Núñez MX. Endophthalmitis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. after penetrating keratoplasty, case report with an epidemiological investigation. biomedica [Internet]. 2010 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 May 18];30(3):327-31. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/265
Published
2010-09-30
Section
Case presentation

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code