Evidence-based medicine: an epistemological approach

Daniel Eduardo Henao, Fabián Alberto Jaimes, .

Keywords: evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, knowledge, science

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine gathers physician’s experience and the best scientific evidence to make medical decisions. This proposal has been widely promulgated by medical opinion leaders. Despite a large literature supporting this practice, a formal discussion has not been established regarding its epistemological consequences in daily medical work. The main proposal of evidence-based medicine consists of choosing the best medical decision according to the best available results from scientific studies. Herein, the goal was to highlight inappropriate application of the scientific method used by physics to clinical science. The inaccuracy resides in describing health and disease in strictly numeric equivalents that can be homogenized on a continuous scale. Finally, the authors consider each diseased human being as a complex system, unique and particular, and that this being is defined by an historical background as well as current actual context. Therefore, evidence-based medicine possesses certain limitations that must be recognized in order to to provide better health care to patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Daniel Eduardo Henao Grupo Reproducción, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
  • Fabián Alberto Jaimes Grupo Académico de Epidemiología Clínica (GRAEPIC), Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia

References

1. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992;268:2420-5.
2. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71-2.
3. Marshall T. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995; 346:1171-2.
4. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ. 1995;310: 1122-6.
5. Sackett D. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:1171.
6. Feinstein AR, Horwitz RI. Problems in the “evidence” of “evidence-based medicine”. Am J Med. 1997;103:529-35.
7. Evidence-based medicine, in its place. Lancet. 1995; 346:785.
8. Grahame-Smith D. Evidence based medicine: Socratic dissent. BMJ. 1995;310:1126-7.
9. Sleigh JW. Evidence-based medicine and Kurt Godel. Lancet. 1995;346:1172.
10. Aveyard P. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995; 346: 840.
11. Bradley F, Field J. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:838-9.
12. Chagla LS, McCulloch PG. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:839-40.
13. Fowler PB. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995; 346:838.
14. Haynes B. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;346: 1171.
15. Iggo N. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:839-40.
16. Morgan WK. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995; 346:1172.
17. Shahar E. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet.1995;346: 1172.
18. White KL. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;346: 837-8.
19. Ellis J, Mulligan I, Rowe J, Sackett DL. Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. A-Team, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:407-10.
20. Gill P, Dowell AC, Neal RD, Smith N, Heywood P, Wilson AE. Evidence based general practice: a retrospective study of interventions in one training practice. BMJ. 1996;312:819-21.
21. Hughes J. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:839-40.
22. Norman G. Evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:1300.
23. Canguilhem G. Augusto Comte y el “principio de Broussais”. En: Lo normal y lo patológico. Primera edición. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno; 1971. p. 25-41.
24. Burgos L. Introducción a la nueva biología. Primera edición. Medellín: Biogénesis; 2003.
25. Hubert R. Brevarios del pensamiento filosófico “Comte”. Primera edición. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana; 1943.
26. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-72.
27. Canguilhem G. Lo normal y lo patológico. Primera edición. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno; 1971. p. 83-113.
28. Canguilhem G. Claude Bernard y la patología experimental. En: Lo normaly lo patológico. Primera edición. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno; 1971. p. 41-62.
29. Canguilhem G. Las concepciones de R. Leriche. En: Lo normal y lo patológico. Primera edición. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno; 1971. p. 63-71.
How to Cite
1.
Henao DE, Jaimes FA. Evidence-based medicine: an epistemological approach. biomedica [Internet]. 2009 Mar. 1 [cited 2024 May 17];29(1):33-42. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/39

Some similar items:

Section
Essay

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code