Bibliometric evaluation of Latin American contributions on COVID-19

Orlando Gregorio-Chaviano , Cesar H. Limaymanta , Evony K. López-Mesa , .

Keywords: Coronavirus infections, bibliometrics, bibliometric indicators, information management, Latin America

Abstract

Introduction: The propagation of COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, has become a pandemic which, along with its rapid dissemination worldwide, has brought about an exponential increase in the amount of research related to the subject to which Latin American researchers have contributed actively.
Objective: To conduct a descriptive bibliometric study of the main trends in research on COVID-19 produced in Latin America.
Materials and methods: We searched in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Pubmed databases to retrieve the Latin American scientific production on COVID-19. Bibliometric indicators of production, visibility, impact, and collaboration were analyzed to assess the regional participation in studies on the subject.
Results: The analysis of 142 documents evidenced an exponential growth of scientific production in the period analyzed, an important level of international collaboration (51.4%) in scientific production, and the leadership of regional institutions (71%) in the research with publications in high-visibility jounals especially in Colombia, Brazil, and México.
Conclusions: The results regarding the regional participation in the research on COVID-19 were relevant not only in relation to its quantity and exponential growth during the period analyzed but also in terms of its quality and excellence with a high rate of international collaboration and publications in important scientific journals, which besides their visibility, represent a considerable contribution to the research compared to the other geographical contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – March 3, 2020. Fecha de consulta: 20 de abril de 2020. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-themedia-briefing-on-covid-19---3-march-2020

Rodríguez-Morales AJ, Sánchez-Duque JA, Botero SH, Pérez-Díaz CE, Villamil-Gómez WE, Méndez CA, et al. Preparación y control de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) en América Latina. Acta Med Perú. 2020;37:3-7.

Torres-Salinas D. Ritmo de crecimiento diario de la producción científica sobre Covid-19. Análisis en bases de datos y repositorios en acceso abierto. El Profesional de la Información. 2020;29:e290215. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.15

Alba-Ruiz R. Covid-19, coronavirus pandemic: aproximación bibliométrica y revisión de los resultados. Zenodo. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3734062

Lou J, Tian SJ, Niu SM, Kang XQ, Lian HX, Zhang LX, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019: A bibliometric analysis and review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:3411-21. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202003_20712

Chahrour M, Assi S, Bejjani M, Nasrallah AA, Salhab H, Fares MY, et al. A bibliometric analysis of Covid-19 research activity: A call for increased output. Cureus. 2020;12:e7357. https://doi.org/doi:10.7759/cureus.7357

Da Silva S, Perlin M, Matsushita R, Santos AA, Imasato T, Borenstein D. Lotka’s law for the Brazilian scientific output published in journals. J Inf Sci. 2019;45:705-09. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551518801813

Kumar S. Author productivity and the application of Lotka’s law in LIS publications. Author productivity and the application of Lotka’s law in LIS publications. 2017;64:234-41.

Rau J. ¿Sigue la producción de artículos ISI de los ecólogos chilenos (sensu lato) la ley de Lotka (1926)? Rev Chil Hist Nat. 2011;84:213-6. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2011000200007

Urbizagástegui-Alvarado R. Una revisión crítica de la ley de Bradford. Investigación bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información. 1996;10:16-26. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.1996.20.3835

Price D. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press; 1963.

van Eck, NJ, Ludo W. Visualizing bibliometric networks. En: Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D, editors. Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Basel: Springer; 2014. p. 285-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13

Perianes-Rodríguez A, Waltman L, Van Eck N. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. J Informetr. 2016;10:1178-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006

Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science. 1968;159:56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56

De-Moya-Anegón F. Liderazgo y excelencia de la ciencia española. El Profesional de la información. 2012;21:125-8. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.mar.01

Glänzel W. Coauthorships patterns and trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends. 2002;50:461-73.

Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Rosati F. Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: The importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline. Scientometrics. 2013;97:779-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1013-9

González PD, González MI. Hábitos de publicación y citación según campos científicos: principales diferencias a partir de las revistas JCR. Rev Esp Doc Cient. 2013;36:en012. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.4.1003

Lazcano-Peña D, Reyes-Lillo D. Redes académicas en la investigación en Comunicación en Chile: análisis de coautorías en el trabajo científico. Rev Esp Doc Cient. 2020;43:e259. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2020.1.1626

Osma ER de. Aplicación del modelo Bradford en la producción científica del área biomédica de la Universidad de Granada (1988-1996). Encontros Bibli. 2007;11:1-23. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2006v11nesp2p1

Quilindo C. Investigación médica en Latinoamérica. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad del Cauca. 2019; 21:50-1.

Dumas-Mallet E, Garenne A, Boraud T, Gonon F. Does newspapers coverage influence the citations count of scientific publications? An analysis of biomedical studies. Scientometrics. 2020;123:413-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03380-1

Kokol P, Blažun H, Završnik, J. Application of bibliometrics in medicine: A historical bibliometrics analysis. Health Info Libr J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12295

Zhang L, Li B, Jia P, Pu J, Bai B, Li Y, et al. An analysis of global research on SARS-CoV-2. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2020;37:236-45. https://doi.org/10.7507/1001-5515.202002034

How to Cite
1.
Gregorio-Chaviano O, Limaymanta CH, López-Mesa EK. Bibliometric evaluation of Latin American contributions on COVID-19. biomedica [Internet]. 2020 Oct. 30 [cited 2024 May 19];40(Supl. 2):104-15. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/5571

Some similar items:

Published
2020-10-30

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code