Construct validity and internal consistency of three factor structures and two scoring methods of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire
Abstract
Introduction: The analysis of the psychometric properties of an instrument is important for the control of measurement bias.
Objective: To compare the construct validity and internal consistency of three factorial structures of the General Health Questionnaire-12.
Materials and methods: We conducted a validation study in a nested sample of 483 dentistry students from Cartagena, Colombia. The instrument was applied along with questions about personal factors. The construct validity of the following structures was evaluated: one-dimensional, one-dimensional with correction of response bias, and the two and three-factor structure, and these scoring systems: Likert scale (0-1-2-3) and dichotomous (0-0-1-1) scoring method. Validity was determined by confirmatory factorial analysis, and the internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the Likert scale and the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 for the dichotomous scoring using the Stata™, v. 13.2 (Stata Corp, USA) and Mplus™, v.7.11 (Muthen and Muthen, USA) software.
Results: Adjustment indexes revealed that the best model was the one-dimensional one with correction of response bias based on a dichotomous scoring (degrees of freedom=36; chi square=52.432; root mean square error of approximation=0.03; 90% CI: 0.008-0.048; comparative fit index=0.982; Tucker-Lewis index=0.966). The internal consistency was 0.70.
Conclusions: The adjustment of the model in this study allowed for the control of measurement bias and guaranteed external validity of results when using the General Health Questionnaire-12 to evaluate mental conditions in this population. The psychometric properties of the scales should be critically evaluated before results analysis.
Downloads
References
Goldberg DP. The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire: A technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic psychiatric illness. London: Oxford University Press; 1972. p. 156.
Namjoo S, Shagaghi A, Sarbaksh P, Allahverdipour H, Pakpour AH. Psychometric properties of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to be applied for the Iranian elder population. Aging Ment Health. 2016:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1196337
Golderberg D, Williams P. A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson; 1988.
Rocha KB, Pérez K, Sanz MR, Borrell C, Llandrich JO. Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población general española. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2011;11:125-39.
Petkovska MS, Bojadziev MI, Stefanovska VV. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire among general population. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2015;3:478-83. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2015.075
Goodchild M, Duncan-Jones P. Chronicity and the General Health Questionnaire. Br J Psychiatry. 1985;146:55-61.
Rahmati-Najarkolaei F, Raiisi F, Rahnama P, Gholami-Fesharaki M, Zamani O, Jafari MR, et al. Factor structure of the Iranian version of 12-item general health questionnaire. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16:e11794. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.11794
Andrich D, van Schoubroeck L. The General Health Questionnaire: A psychometric analysis using latent trait theory. Psychol Med. 1989;19:469-85.
Graetz B. Multidimensional properties of the General Health Questionnaire. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1991;26:132-8
Smith AB, Fallowfield LJ, Stark DP, Velikova G, Jenkins V. A Rasch and confirmatory factor analysis of the general health questionnaire (GHQ)--12. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-45
van Ballegooijen W, Riper H, Cuijpers P, van Oppen P, Smit JH. Validation of online psychometric instruments for common mental health disorders: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0735-7
Hankins M. The reliability of the twelve-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) under realistic assumptions. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:355. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-355
Hankins M. The factor structure of the twelve item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): The result of negative phrasing? Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2008;4:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-4-10
Gelaye B, Tadesse MG, Lohsoonthorn V, Lertmeharit S, Pensuksan WC, Sánchez SE, et al. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire as a screening tool for anxiety and depressive symptoms in a multi-national study of young adults. J Affect Disord. 2015;187:197-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.045
Padrón A, Galán I, Durban M, Gandarillas A, Rodríguez-Artalejo F. Confirmatory factor analysis of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in Spanish adolescents. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1291-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0038-x
Abu-Ghazaleh SB, Rajab LD, Sonbol HN. Psychological stress among dental students at the University of Jordan. J Dent Educ. 2011;75:1107-14.
Brabete AC. The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Translation and adaptation study of the Romanian version. RIDEP. 2014;37:11-29.
Villa G, Cristina I, Zuluaga-Arboleda C, Restrepo-Roldán LF. Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Salud General de Goldberg, GHQ-12, en una institución hospitalaria de la ciudad de Medellín. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana. 2013;31:532-45.
Simancas MA, Arrieta KM. Common mental disorders and related factors in undergraduate and graduate students from three dental faculties in Cartagena, Colombia. Study protocol. Journal of Oral Research. 2014;3:178-83. https://doi.org/10.17126/JORALRES.2014.042
Campo-Arias A. Cuestionario general de salud-12: análisis de factores en población general de Bucaramanga, Colombia. Iatreia. 2007;20:29-36.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53-5. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Hassan BK, Werneck GL, Hasselmann MH. Maternal mental health and nutritional status of six-month-old infants. Rev Saúde Pública. 2016;50:7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006237
Rutagarama O, Gelaye B, Tadesse MG, Lemma S, Berhane Y, Williams MA. Risk of common mental disorders in relation to symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome among ethiopian college students. J Sleep Disord Treat Care. 2015;4. https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9639.1000161
Lopes CS, Abreu G de A, dos Santos DF, Menezes PR, de Carvalho KM, Cunha Cde F, et al. ERICA: Prevalence of common mental disorders in Brazilian adolescents. Rev Saúde Pública. 2016;50(Suppl.1):14s. https://doi.org/10.1590/S01518-8787.2016050006690
Aguado J, Campbell A, Ascaso C, Navarro P, García-Esteve L, Luciano JV. Examining the factor structure and discriminant validity of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) among Spanish postpartum women. Assessment. 2012;19:517-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110388146
Rey JJ, Abad FJ, Barrada JR, Garrido LE, Ponsoda V. The impact of ambiguous response categories on the factor structure of the GHQ–12. Psychol Assess. 2014;26:1021-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036468
Williams B, Onsman A, Brown T. Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australian Journal of Paramedicine. 2010;8:1-13.
Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Publications; 2015.
Molina JG, Rodrigo MF, Losilla JM, Vives J. Wording effects and the factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Psychol Assess. 2014;26:1031-7. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036472
Urzúa A, Caqueo-Urízar A, Bargsted M, Irarrázaval M. ¿Afecta la forma de puntuación la estructura factorial del GHQ-12? Estudio exploratorio en estudiantes iberoamericanos. Cad Saúde Pública. 2015;31:1305-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00122913
Mazaheri M, Theuns P. Effects of varying response formats on self-ratings of life-satisfaction. Soc Indic Res. 2009;90: 381-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9263-2
Some similar items:
- Jorge Arturo Martínez, Walter Amaya, Horacio Alfredo Campillo, Adalberto Campo, Luis Alfonso Díaz, Social factors associated with the daily cigarette smoking among middle-school student adolescents in Bucaramanga, Colombia. , Biomedica: Vol. 25 No. 4 (2005)
- María Cecilia Paredes, Yenny Milena Gómez, Ana Marcela Torres, Marcela Fernández, María Belén Tovar, Prevalence of infections by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among high school students in the Sabana Central area of Cundinamarca, Colombia , Biomedica: Vol. 35 No. 3 (2015)
- Pedro José Villamizar, Sandra Milena Moreno, Freddy Moreno, Management of electronic social networks by students of medicine: The case of publication of photographs with patients and professional medical conduct , Biomedica: Vol. 36 No. 1 (2016)
- Carlos Arturo Cassiani-Miranda, María Camila Vargas-Hernández, Eduard Pérez-Anibal, Mariana Isabel Herazo-Bustos, Mauricio Hernández-Carrillo, Reliability and dimensionality of PHQ-9 in screening depression symptoms among health science students in Cartagena, 2014 , Biomedica: Vol. 37 No. Sup.1 (2017): Suplemento 1, Alteraciones del sistema nervioso
- Adalberto Campo-Arias, Yuly Paola Suárez-Colorado, Carmen Cecilia Caballero-Domínguez, Dra., Association between the use of Cannabis and elevated suicide risk in high school adolescents from Santa Marta, Colombia , Biomedica: Vol. 40 No. 3 (2020)
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
