Efficacy of Orbscan II® and Pentacam® topographers by a repeatability analysis when assessing elevation maps in candidates to refractive surgery

Claudia Blanco, María Ximena Núñez, .

Keywords: cornea, corneal topography, keratoconus, reproducibility of results, selection bias, efficacy

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior and posterior corneal elevations are measurements used to detect keratoconus suspects.
Purpose: To determine the efficacy of Orbscan II® and Pentacam® when assessing their elevation maps.
Materials and methods: The efficacy of the Orbscan II and Pentacam measuring the anterior and posterior corneal elevations were evaluated in a sample of 68 eyes. The concordance between the two devices and the coefficient of repeatability were measured following the parameters of the British Standard Institution by the Bland-Altman concordance analysis and the Lin concordance correlation coefficient.
Results: The coefficient of repeatability at the point of maximum anterior elevation was 68.29% with the Orbscan and 24.20% with the Pentacam. The concordance correlation coefficient was 0.64 (CI 95%: 0.48-0.76) with the Orbscan and 0.94 with the Pentacam (CI 95%: 0.91-0.96). The coefficient of repeatability at the point of maximum posterior elevation was 38.7% with the Orbscan and 68.0% with the Pentacam. The concordance correlation coefficient was 0.69 with the Orbscan (CI 95%: 0.55-0.80) with a precision of 0.71 and an accuracy of 0.97, and 0.24 with the Pentacam (CI 95%: 0.00-0.45) with a precision of 0.24 and an accuracy of 0.99.
Conclusions: Measurement of the point of maximum posterior elevation is better with the Orbscan II and less precise with the Pentacam. The random error can be reduced by using the mean of three assessments and can serve as a guide in the search of diagnostic devices with minimum absolute relative error in all measurements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Claudia Blanco Cornea and Refractive Surgery Unit, Vision Sana Research Group, Clínica de Oftalmología de Cali, Cali, Colombia. Ophthalmology Service. Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
  • María Ximena Núñez Cornea and Refractive Surgery Unit, Vision Sana Research Group, Clínica de Oftalmología de Cali, Cali, Colombia

References

1. Rao S, Raviv T, Majmudar PA, Epstein RJ. Role of Orbscan II in screening keratoconus suspects before refractive corneal surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1642-6.
2. Turner T. What corneal topography can tell you about corneal shape. In: Drummond AE, editor. Customized corneal ablation: The quest for supervision.1st edition. Grove Road: Slack Inc; 2001. p. 11-32.
3. Jain R, Dilraj G, Grewal SP. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55:341-7.
4. Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, Pesudovs K. Anterior segment biometry with Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34: 103-13.
5. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovics MA, Skorpik C. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and Ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:892-9.
6. Chen D, Lam AK. Intrasession and intersession repeatability of the Pentacam system on posterior corneal assessment in the normal human eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:448-54.
7. Carvajal R. Medición. En: Carvajal A, Torres C, Pubiano J, editores. Estadística para análisis epidemiológico.1 edición. Cali: Catorse; 2004. p. 18-32.
8. British Standards Institution. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results: general principles and definitions. BS ISO 5725 part 1. London; HMO; 1994.
9. British Standards Institution. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results: basic methods for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method. BS ISO 5725 part 2. London: HMO; 1994.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307-10.
11. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255-68.
12. Lin LI. A note on the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics. 2000;56:324-5.
13. Fam HB, Lim KL. Corneal elevation indices in normal and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1281-7.
14. Hashemi H, Mehravaran S. Corneal changes after laser refractive surgery for myopia: comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam findings. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:841-7.
15. Quisling S, Sjoberg S, Zimmerman B, Goins K, Sutphin J. Comparison of Pentacam and Orbscan IIz on posterior curvature topography measurements in keratoconus eyes. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1629-32.
How to Cite
1.
Blanco C, Núñez MX. Efficacy of Orbscan II® and Pentacam® topographers by a repeatability analysis when assessing elevation maps in candidates to refractive surgery. biomedica [Internet]. 2009 Sep. 1 [cited 2024 May 18];29(3):362-8. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/8

Some similar items:

Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code