Frequencies of congenital malformations: assessment and prognosis of 52,744 births in three cities of Colombia

Ignacio Zarante, Liliana Franco, Catalina López, Nicolás Fernández, .

Keywords: congenital abnormalities/epidemiology, prognosis, infant mortality, disabled children, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Abstract

Introduction. The Instituto de Genética Humana of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana conducted an epidemiological surveillance of congenital malformations as defined by criteria provided by the Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations.
Objective. The frequency of the main congenital malformations were tabulated for major urban centers in Colombia.
Materials and methods. Information was gathered from 52,744 newborns between April 2001 and January 2008 in three cities of Colombia (Bogotá, Ubaté and Manizales). Data included the age of mother, gestational age, gender and weight of the newborn and the congenital malformation. Cases were classified according to a prognostic scale to assess the impact of health team interventions in the recovery process.
Results. Congenital defects were noted in 3.1% of the newborns. The most frequent congenital defects were those of the ears. Clubfoot, polydactyly and cleft lip or palate were more common amongst males. The weight and gestational age were lower in the congenitally affected in comparison with the control group. The prognostic scale of congenital malformations indicated that most of these patients are at high risk of death or disability and that the intervention of the health team changed the patient´s prognosis in approximately 80% of the cases.
Conclusion. Frequencies of congenital malformations in Colombia were similar to those reported in other countries. The interventions of the health team in treating patients with congenital malformations directly affected patient prognosis. Therefore, early diagnosis and adequate interdisciplinary treatment were recommended by these data in order to reduce disability and improve the quality of life of these patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Ignacio Zarante Instituto de Genética Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
  • Liliana Franco Instituto de Genética Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
  • Catalina López Instituto de Genética Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
  • Nicolás Fernández Instituto de Genética Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia

References

1. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. Global report on birth defects. New York: White Plañís; 2006. Fecha de consulta: abril de 2009. Disponible en: http://www.marchofdimes.com/professionals/871_18587.asp.
2. Calderón JS, Zarante I. Anomalías congénitas urológicas: descripción epidemiológica y factores de riesgo asociados en Colombia 2001-2004. Arch Esp Urol. 2005;59:7-14.
3. Baltaxe E, Zarante I. Prevalencia de malformaciones cardíacas congénitas en 44.985 nacimientos en Colombia. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2006;76:263-8.
4. Castilla E, Orioli IM. ECLAMC: The Latin-American collaborative study of congenital malformations. Community Genet. 2004;7:76-94.
5. Castilla E, Mastroiacovo P, López-Camelo JS, Saldarriaga W, Isaza C, Orioli IM. Sirenomelia and cyclopia cluster in Cali, Colombia. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146:2626-36.
6. Orioli IM, Mastroiacovo P, López-Camelo JS, Saldarriaga W, Isaza C, Zarante I, et al. Clusters of sirenomelia in South America. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2009;85:112-8.
7. Fernández N, Zarante I. Prevalencia y escala pronóstico para malformaciones congénitas en Colombia: la responsabilidad de pediatras y neonatólogos. Registro de 54.397 nacimientos. UCIN. 2007;7:28-32.
8. Sekhobo J, Druschel C. An evaluation of congenital malformations surveillance in New York State: An application for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for evaluating surveillance systems. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:296-305.
9. Nazer J, Aravena T, Cifuentes L. Malformaciones congénitas en Chile. Un problema emergente (período 1995-1999). Rev Méd Chile. 2001;129:895-904.
10. International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Monitoring Systems (ICBDMS). Annual Report 2006. Fecha de consulta: marzo de 2009. Disponible en: www.icbdsr.org
11. Lisi A, Botto L, Rittler M, Castilla E, Bianca S, Bianchi F, et al. Sex and congenital malformations: an international perspective. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;134A:49-57.
12. Shapiro BL. The environmental basis of the Down syndrome phenotype. Dev Med Child Neurol.1994;36:84-90.
13. Kaminker P, Armando R. Síndrome de Down. Segunda parte: estudios genéticos y función del pediatra. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2008;106:334-40.
14. Trigos Micoló I, Guzmán, López Figueroa ME. Análisis de la incidencia, prevalencia y atención del labio y paladar hendido en México. Cir Plast. 2003;13:35-9.
15. Nazer J, Villa JJ, Van Deer R, Cifuentes L. Incidencia de labio leporino y paladar hendido en Latinoamérica: período 1982-1990. Rev Pediatría (Santiago). 1994;37:13-9.
16. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Censo general 2005. Discapacidad. Fecha de consulta: abril 2009]. Disponible en:www.dane.gov.co/censo.
17. Gómez J, Fernández N, Zarante I. Detección de anomalías congénitas en 12.760 nacimientos de tres hospitales de la ciudad de Bogotá 2004-2005 mediante ecografía prenatal. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2007;58:194-201.
How to Cite
1.
Zarante I, Franco L, López C, Fernández N. Frequencies of congenital malformations: assessment and prognosis of 52,744 births in three cities of Colombia. biomedica [Internet]. 2010 Mar. 1 [cited 2024 May 17];30(1):65-71. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/154

Some similar items:

Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code