Comparison of methodologies for microscopic malaria diagnosis

Liliana Jazmín Cortés, Lyda Muñoz, Martha Stella Ayala, .

Keywords: malaria/diagnosis, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium falciparum, Colombia

Abstract

Introduction: As part of the pre-elimination plan for malaria in Colombia, it has been proposed to develop activities within the line of work: “Improve access and quality of malaria diagnosis”.
Objective: To compare the methodology recommended by PAHO/WHO with that used in Colombia for the diagnosis of malaria.
Materials and methods: Samples were collected and 88 slides were prepared for malaria diagnosis, under different scenarios according to the parameters to be evaluated. After duplicate mycroscopic reading, the respective variance calculations were performed for all possible staining comparisons with the two methods used (thick smear, combined thick smear), according to the staining (modified Romanowsky or Giemsa), with the result variable being the parasite density (500, 1,000, 5,000 and 10,000 parasites/μl of blood).
Results: A Cohen kappa index of inter-rater agreement of 0.923 (95% CI: 0.768-1.078) was obtained. None of the factors (A: stain, B: methodology) or interactions (AB) had a statistically significant effect on the results with a 95% confidence level.
Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, the preparation of two thick smears in the same slide stained with the modified Romanowsky stain is a suitable methodology for the diagnosis of malaria in Colombia, due to its technical characteristics, of storage, low cost, use and care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Liliana Jazmín Cortés Grupo de Parasitología, Dirección de Redes en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
  • Lyda Muñoz Grupo de Parasitología, Dirección de Redes en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
  • Martha Stella Ayala Grupo de Parasitología, Dirección de Redes en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia

References

Instituto Nacional de Salud. Protocolo para la Vigilancia en Salud Pública de Malaria. Subdirección de Vigilancia y Control en Salud Pública. PRO-R02-021. Bogotá: Instituto Nacional de Salud; 2014. p. 1.

Instituto Nacional de Salud. Programa de evaluación externa del desempeño (PEED) para malaria del Grupo de Parasitología. Bogotá: Instituto Nacional de Salud; 2015. p. 3.

Instituto Nacional de Salud. Boletín Epidemiológico Semanal. Sivigila, semana 52 de 2015. Bogotá: Instituto Nacional de Salud; 2015. p. 35-36.

Mendoza NM, Nicholls RS, Olano VA, Cortés LJ. Manual de manejo integral de malaria. Bogotá: Instituto Nacional de Salud; 2000. p. 88-89.

Ospina OL, Cortés LJ, Cucunubá ZM. Mendoza NM, Chaparro P. Caracterización de la Red Nacional de Diagnóstico de Malaria, Colombia, 2006-2010. Biomédica. 2012;32(Supl.1):46-57. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0120-41572012000500007

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Guía para la reorientación de los programas de control de la malaria con miras a la eliminación. Washington, D.C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2011. p. 3.

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Bases del diagnóstico microscópico del paludismo. Segunda edición. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2014.

Servicio Nacional de Erradicación de Malaria (SNEM), Red Amazónica de Vigilancia de la Resistencia a las Drogas Antimaláricas (RAVREDA). Manual Operativo Estándar para la Gestión del Diagnostico Microscópico de Plasmodium. Quito: RAVREDA; 2008. p. 26-30.

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Taller de capacitación y certificación de microscopistas para países de la región de las Américas. México, D.F.: OPS; 2016. p. 39-43.

Pan American Health Organization. Malaria in the Americas. PAHO Bull. 1996;17:1-8.

López-Antuñano FJ, Schmunis G. Diagnóstico microscópico de los parásitos de la malaria en la sangre. En: López-Antuñano FJ, Schmunis G, editores. Diagnóstico de malaria. Publicación científica 512. Washington, D.C.: OPSOMS; 1988. p. 39-50.

Ohrt C, Prudhomme O’Meara W, Remich S, McEvoy P, Ogutu B, Mtalib R, et al. Pilot assessment of the sensitivity of the malaria thin film. Malar J. 2008;28:7:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-7-22

Fernando SD, Ihalamulla RL, Wickremasinghe R, de Silva NL, Thilakarathne JH, Wijeyaratne P, et al. Effects of modifying the World Health Organization standard operating procedures for malaria microscopy to improve surveillance in resource poor settings. Malar J. 2014;13:2-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-98

Ugah UI, Alo MN, Owolabi JO, Okata-Nwali OD, Ekejindu IM, Ibeh N, et al. Evaluation of the utility value of three diagnostic methods in the detection of malaria parasites in endemic area. Malar J. 2017;16:189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-1838-4

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960;20:37-46.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74.

Rivas-Ruiz R, Moreno-Palacios J, Talavera J. Diferencias de medianas con la U de Mann-Whitney. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2013;51:414-9.

Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud. Guía para la atención clínica integral del paciente con malaria. Bogotá: MSPS, OPS e INS; 2010. p. 79-80.

Mohapatra S, Ghosh A, Singh R, Singh DP, Sharma B, Samantaray JC, et al. Hemozoin pigment: An important tool for low parasitemic malarial diagnosis. Korean J Parasitol. 2016;54:393-7. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2016.54.4.393

Bejon P, Andrews L, Hunt-Cooke A, Sanderson F, Gilbert SC, Hill AV, et al. Thick blood film examination for Plasmodium falciparum malaria has reduced sensitivity and underestimates parasite density. Malar J. 2006;5:104. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1475-2875-5-104

Iannacone JA, Caballero C, Rentería JA. La técnica de precoloración de Walker para evaluar Plasmodium vivax Grassi y Plasmodium malariae Laveran en comunidades Ashaninkas en Satipo (Junín, Perú). Revista Peruana de Biología. 1999;6:171-80.

World Health Organization. Malaria microscopy. Quality assurance. Manual, Version 2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. p. 22.

Perandin F, Manca G, Piccolo A, Calderaro A, Galati L, Ricci L, et. al. Identification of Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae and detection of mixed infection in patients with imported malaria in Italy. New Microbiol. 2003;26:91-100.

Campuzano-Zuluaga G, Blair-Trujillo S. Malaria: consideraciones sobre su diagnóstico. Medicina y Laboratorio. 2010;16:311-54.

Parsel SM, Gustafson SA, Friedlander E, Shnyra AA, Adegbulu AJ, Liu Y, et al. Malaria over-diagnosis in Cameroon: Diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence and staining technologies (FAST) malaria stain and LED microscopy versus Giemsa and bright field microscopy validated by polymerase chain reaction. Infect Dis Poverty.

;6:32. https://doi.org/:10.1186/s40249-017-0251-0

How to Cite
1.
Cortés LJ, Muñoz L, Ayala MS. Comparison of methodologies for microscopic malaria diagnosis. biomedica [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 15 [cited 2024 May 18];38(2):244-52. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/3803

Some similar items:

Published
2018-06-15
Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code