Assessment of the operational characteristics of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress management tool, v. 2.2018, in patients seen at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá

Sofía Elizabeth Muñoz , Ricardo Sánchez, Ligia Elena del Toro, .

Keywords: Validation studies, cross-cultural comparison, mental status schedule, psychological distress, neoplasm, sensitivity and specificity

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer patients have significant levels of emotional distress. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) developed the distress management tool to quickly assess significant distress in oncological patients who require intervention. For its use in Colombia, we made its cross-cultural adaptation and validation.
Objective: To determine the operative characteristics of the distress management tool, version 2.2018, in patients seen at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INC) in Colombia.
Materials and methods: Counting with the authorization from the NCCN, we translated, made the cross-cultural adaptation, and evaluated the operational characteristics of the tool. We included 343 cancer patients seen at the INC, who filled out the cross-culturally adapted instrument. A diagnostic test study was carried out with a semi-structured interview as a reference.
Results: The patients had an average age of 49.7 years (SD=15) and the majority were women (67%). The instrument had an area under the ROC curve of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77 -0.86); its optimal cut-off point was 3.5 approached to 4 when using integers on the scale; its sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.85), and its specificity, 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.74). The agreement percentage between the result of the interview and the instrument was 73% (kappa = 0.64; p< 0.001).
Conclusions: The distress management tool allowed for the detection of moderate to severe distress requiring intervention and management. This instrument was adapted and validated in cancer patients in Colombia keeping the cutoff point at ≥ 4 as in the original version.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Sofía Elizabeth Muñoz Grupo Área de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - E.S.E., Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8038-298X
  • Ricardo Sánchez Grupo Área de Investigaciones, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - E.S.E., Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7540-4734
  • Ligia Elena del Toro Grupo de Salud Mental, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - E.S.E., Bogotá, D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6389-6225

References

Moreno A, Acosta M, Krikorian A, Palacio C. Malestar emocional, ansiedad y depresión en pacientes oncológicos colombianos y su relación con la competencia percibida. Av Psicol Latinoam 2015;33:517-29. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.3148

Almanza J, Rosario I, Silva J, Huerta R. Distrés psicosocial y trastornos mentales en una muestra de pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Rev Sanid Milit Mex. 2009;63:148-55.

Hernández M, Cruzado JA, Prado C, Rodríguez E. Salud mental y malestar emocional en pacientes con cáncer. Psicooncología. 2012;9:233-57. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_PSIC.2013.v9.n2-3.40895

Holland JC, Deshields TL, Andersen B, Braun I, Breitbart WS, Brewer BW, et al. Distress management. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Version 2. Philadelphia: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2018. p.1-92.

Singer S, Szalai C, Briest S, Brown A, Dietz A, Einenkel J, et al. Co-morbid mental health conditions in cancer patients at working age - Prevalence, risk profiles, and care uptake. Psycho-oncology. 2013;22:2291-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3282

Derogatis LR, Morrow GR, Fetting J, Penman D, Piasetsky S, Schmale AM, et al. The prevalence of psychiatric disorders among cancer patients. JAMA. 1983;249:751-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1983.03330300035030

Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001;10:19-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::AID-PON501>3.0.CO;2-6

Kendall J, Glaze K, Oakland S, Hansen J, Parry C. What do 1281 distress screeners tell us about cancer patients in a community cancer center? Psycho-Oncology. 2011;20:594-600. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1907

Au H, Ringash J, Brundage M, Palmer M, Richardson H, Meyer RM, et al. Added value of health-related quality of life measurement in cancer clinical trials: The experience of the NCIC CTG. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10:119-28. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.10.15

Fawzy FI. Psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer: What works and what doesn’t. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1559-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00191-4

Fann J, Ell K, Sharpe M. Integrating Psychosocial Care Into Cancer Services. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1178-86. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7398

Ryan H, Schofield P, Cockburn J, Butow P, Tattersall M, Turner J, et al. How to recognize and manage psychological distress in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care. 2005;14:7-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00482.x

Adler N, Page A, Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Psychosocial Services to Cancer Patients/Families in a Community Setting. Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs. Washington: National Academies Press; 2008. p. 23-83.

Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology. The emotional facts of life with cancer. Fourth edition. Cánada: Enbridge; 2012. p. 4-22.

Commission on Cancer. Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care. V1.2.1. Chicago: American College of Surgeons; 2012. p. 25-48.

Aliaga J, Rodríguez L, Ponce C, Frisancho A, Enríquez J. Escala de desesperanza de Beck (BHS): adaptación y características psicométricas. Rev Investig Psicol 2006;9:69-79. https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v9i1.4029

Ramos JC, Cordero A. A new validation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. J Psychiatr Res. 1988;22:21-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(88)90024-6

Rico J, Restrepo M, Molina M. Adaptación y validación de la escala hospitalaria de ansiedad y depresión (HAD) en una muestra de pacientes con cáncer del Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Colombia. Av Medición. 2005;3:73-86.

Londoño C, Alejo IE. Instrumentos usados en Colombia para evaluar la dimensión psicológica del proceso salud-enfermedad. Bogotá: Logos Vestigium; 2017. p. 39-67. http://hdl.handle.net/10983/15964

Hernández M, Cruzado J, Prado C, Rodríguez E, Hernández C, González M, et al. Salud mental y malestar emocional en pacientes con cáncer. Psicooncología. 2012;9:233-57. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_PSIC.2013.v9.n2-3.40895

Vodermaier A, Linden W, Siu C. Screening for emotional distress in cancer patients: A systematic review of assessment instruments. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1464-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp336

Roth A, Kornblith A, Batel L, Peabody E, Scher H, Holland J. Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma. Am Cancer Soc. 1998;82:1904-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1904::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-X

Cutillo A, O’Hea E, Person S, Lessard D, Harralson T, Boudreaux E. The Distress Thermometer: Cut off points and clinical utility. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017;44:329-36. https://doi.org/10.1188/17.ONF.329-336

Donovan K, Grassi L, McGinty H, Jacobsen P. Validation of the Distress Thermometer worldwide: State of the science. Psycho-oncology. 2014;23:241-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3430

Holland J, Andersen B, Breitbart W, Buchmann L, Compas B, Deshields T, et al. Distress management. J Nat Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11:190-209. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2013.0027

Muñoz S, Sánchez R, Del Toro L. Adaptación transcultural al español de la escala Distress Management del NCCN versión 2.2018 para su utilización en pacientes oncológicos en Colombia. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2019;23:144-51. https://doi.org/10.35509/01239015.12

Perkins N, Schisterman E. The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:670-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj063

Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Iskandarsyah A, Klerk C, Suardi D, Soemitro M, Sadarjoen SS. The Distress Thermometer and its validity: A first psychometric study in Indonesian women with breast cancer. 2013;8:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056353

Almanza J, Rosario I, Pérez S. Traducción, adaptación y validación del termómetro de distrés en una muestra de pacientes mexicanos con cáncer. Rev Sanid Milit Mex. 2008;62:209-17.

Priede A, Torres M, Hoyuela F, Herrán A, González C. El termómetro del distrés como prueba de cribado de ansiedad y depresión en pacientes oncológicos recién diagnosticados. Psicooncología. 2014;11:31-43. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_PSIC.2014.v11.n1.44915

Shim E, Shin Y, Jeon H, Hahm B. Distress and its correlates in Korean cancer patients: Pilot use of the distress thermometer and the problem list. Psychooncology. 2008;17:548-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1275

Meyer T, Klemme H, Herrmann C. Depression but not anxiety is a significant predictor of physicians’ assessments of medical status in physically ill patients. Psychother Psychosom. 2017;69:147-54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000012383

Ozalp E, Cankurtaran E, Soygür H, Geyik P, Jacobsen P. Screening for psychological distress in Turkish cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2007;16:304-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1059

How to Cite
1.
Muñoz SE, Sánchez R, del Toro LE. Assessment of the operational characteristics of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress management tool, v. 2.2018, in patients seen at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá. biomedica [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 15 [cited 2024 May 18];41(4):721-33. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/6131

Some similar items:

Published
2021-12-15
Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code