X-ray radiation dose and associated factors in neonates from the newborn unit of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia

Diana Ramírez , Víctor Ramos , Sandra Navarro, Adriana Montealegre, Julia Arciniegas , .

Keywords: radiation dosage, radiation, radiography, risk factors, infant, newborn

Abstract

Introduction. Radiographs are still widely used, underestimating the risks. This situation is frequent in neonatal care units, generating radiation doses than in adults.
Objective. To quantify the received radiation doses when performing radiographs on neonates and the possible factors associated with higher doses.
Materials and methods. We performed an observational study of 160 neonates from the newborn unit of the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia. We considered the input dose of each radiograph as the dependent variable. Patients were characterized and a multivariate analysis with multiple linear regression was performed to identify associated factors.
Results. We analyzed 160 newborns and 492 radiographs. The most frequent findings were male patients (n=87, 54.4%), cesarean delivery (n=122, 76.3%), and radiograph
indication for respiratory distress (n=123, 24.9%). One-point eight percent of the patients (n=9) did not have radiograph indication. The most frequently taken radiograph was chest (322, 65.4%). Most radiographs were taken with a computerized equipment (n=352, 71.5%), compared to a digital one (n=140, 28.4%). The median input dose with computerized equipment was 0.112 mGy (0.022, 0.134 mGy), and with the digital equipment was 0.020 mGy (0.019, 0.022 mGy).
Conclusions. The general and specific absorbed radiation doses were measured in neonates with a computerized and a digital equipment. We identified higher doses with
the computerized equipment. In addition, it was recognized the correlation between computerized radiography equipment with lower corrected gestational ages as the main factor for dose increase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Diana Ramírez Departamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8166-6821
  • Víctor Ramos Departamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Departamento de Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticas, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-2461
  • Sandra Navarro Departamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1919-8972
  • Adriana Montealegre Departamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-2701
  • Julia Arciniegas Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5480-4974

References

Organización Panamericana de la Salud y Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad de España. Comunicando los riesgos de la radiación en radiodiagnóstico pediátrico. Ginebra: OMS; 2016. p. 3-9.

Renedo S. Riesgos de la radiación en imágenes pediátricas. Neumol Pediatr. 2015;10:54-7. https://doi.org/10.51451/np.v10i2.360

Little MP, Wakeford DR, Tawn EJ, Bouffler SD, Berrington A. Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: Why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology. 2009;251:6-12. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511081686

Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Chichuan Y, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent experimental data. Radiology. 2009;25:13-22. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511080671

Balancini B. Conociendo acerca de la radiación en los niños. Med Infant. 2008;XIV:194-9.

International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP; 2007. Publication 103. Fecha de consulta: 1° de marzo de 2020. Disponible en: https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20103

International Commission on Radiological Protection. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. ICRP; 2017. Publication 135. Fecha de consulta: 1° de marzo de 2020. Disponible en: https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%20103

Kramer R, Khoury H, Vieira JW. CALDose X - A software tool for the assessment of organ and tissue absorbed doses, effective dose and cancer risks in diagnostic radiology. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:6437-59. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/22/011

National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation – BEIR VII. Washington, DC.: The National Academies Press; 2005.

Olgar T, Onal E, Bor D, Okumus N, Atalay Y, Turkyilmaz, et al. Radiation exposure to premature infants in a neonatal intensive care unit in Turkey. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:416-9. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.5.416

Hinojos-Armendáriz VI, Mejía-Rosales SJ, Franco-Cabrera MC. Optimization of radiation dose and image quality in mobile neonatal chest radiography. Radiography. 2018;24:104-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2017.09.004

Dabin J, Struelens L, Vanhavere F. Radiation dose to premature new-borns in the Belgian neonatal intensive care units. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2014;158:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct184

De Sousa MA, da Silva TA, Khoury HJ, Mendes JN, Kawaoka JP. Risks of radiographic procedures for neonates admitted to a public hospital in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Radiol Bras. 2008;41:325-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-39842008000500011

Radiologyinfo.org. Dosis de radiación en exámenes de rayos X y TAC. Qué son los rayos X y qué hacen. 2016. Fecha de consulta: 1° de marzo de 2020. Disponible en: https://www.radiologyinfo.org/es/info/safety-xray

Minkels TJM, Jeukens CR, Andriessen P, van der Linden AN, Dam AJ, van Straaten HL, et al. Dose evaluation for digital X-ray imaging of premature neonates. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2017;177:440-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx062

Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Resolución Número 0000482 de 2018. Bogotá: Minsalud; 2018. p. 46.

Arrieta A. Dosimetría y riesgo radiológico para neonatos en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Medellín: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2012. p. 1-42.

How to Cite
1.
Ramírez D, Ramos V, Navarro S, Montealegre A, Arciniegas J. X-ray radiation dose and associated factors in neonates from the newborn unit of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia. biomedica [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 May 12];43(3):343-51. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/6668

Some similar items:

Published
2023-09-30
Section
Original articles

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo
QR Code